|
Abstract: In order to clarify the relation between rail cant and wheel/rail rolling contact behavior of LM and LMA wheelsets, the contact geometry parameters, creepage of them and CHN60 rail in rolling contact are investigated under different rail cants of 1/20 and 1/40 with an improved numerical method. Kalker’s theory of three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact with non-Hertzian is utilized to analyze the normal pressure and tangential traction in the contact surface of the wheels and rails. Using the normal pressure and tangential traction as a prescribed boundary condition, the fields of stress, strain and elastic displacement in the wheel and rail are calculated with the force/displacement formulations of Bossinesq-Cerruti and the method of Gaussian numerical integration. Two wheel radii of 420 mm and 460 mm are taken into account in the present investigation. Numerical results indicate that the contact stress under the condition of rail cant of 1/20 is smaller than that under the rail cant of 1/40 for LM wheelset. The situation for LMA wheelset is in reverse. Therefore, rail cant 1/20 is better than rail cant 1/40 for LM-CHN60 in rolling contact and rail cant 1/40 is better than rail cant 1/20 for LMA-CHN60. The effect of wheel radius on rolling contact behavior of LM-CHN60 and LMA-CHN60 is insignificant. The results obtained are useful for the optimum of profile match of wheel and rail and the rail cant design.
Key words: Wheelset Rail Rail cant Rolling contact Creepage Creep force Contact stress
CLC No:
U211
国家自然科学基金(50675183)、教育部博士点基金(20060613020)、国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划,
2007CB714702)和四川省青年科技基金资助项目.
Received
20070821,
received
in
revised
form
20071228
|
| References
[1] JENDEL T. Prediction of wheel profile
wear-comparisons with field measurements[J]. Wear, 2002, 253: 89-99.
[2] OLOFSSON U, TELLISKIVI T. Wear, plastic deformation and friction of
two rail steels—a full-scale test and a laboratory study[J]. Wear, 2003,
254: 80-93.
[3] ENBLOM R, BERG M. Simulation of railway wheel profile development
due to wear-influence of disc braking and contact environment[J]. Wear,
2005, 258: 1 055-1 063.
[4] MAGEL E, KALOUSEK J, CALDWELL R. A numerical simulation of wheel
wear[J]. Wear, 2005, 258: 1 245-1 254.
[5] INESA P, IPOLITAS Z K, IGORIS P. Influence of guage width on rail
side wear on track curves[J]. Civil Engineering and Management, 2006,
XII(3): 255-260.
[6] SHEN Zhiyun, HEDRICK J K. The influence of rail lubrication on
freight car wheel/rail wear rates[C]// Proceeding of the International
Conference on Rail Quality and Maintenance for Modern Railway Operation,
Netherlands, 1992: 523-535.
[7]
DU Mushan, WANG Wusheng, HAN Xiangdong. Study and practice on mitigation
of rail side wear on curve by adjusting rail cant[J]. Journal of
Shanghai lnstitute of Railway Technology, 1992, 13(3): 17-28.
[8]
SHEN Gang, ZHANG Dingxian. A study on the influence of rail cant on the
rail side wear on curce[J]. Journal of China Railway Society, 1994,
16(3): 95-99.
[9]
ZHAO Jingrong. Restoration 1: 20 rail cant[J]. Railway Engineering, 1990,
3: 27-29.
[10] KALKER J J. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact[M].
Netherlands, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
[11] JIN X, ZHAN W H. Analysis of creepages and their sensitivities for
a single wheelset moving on a tangent track[J]. Journal of Southwest
Jiaotong University, 1996, 20: 128-136.
[12]
JIN Xuesong, LIU Qiyue. Tribology of wheel and rail[M]. Beijing: China
Railway Press, 2004.
[13]
JIN Xuesong. Theory of wheel /rail and its experimental study[D].
Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 1999.
|