|
Biographical notes
TAN Runhua is currently a professor and a director in Institute of
Design for Innovation, School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei
University of Technology, China. He received his PhD degree from
Zhejiang University, China, in 1998. He is a Vice-Chair (Asia) of IFIP
WG5.4. His main research interests include design theory and
methodology, innovation management, software engineering and design for
mass customization.
Tel:+86-22-60204037; E-mail:rhtan@hebut.edu.cn
MA Lihui is currently a PhD candidate in Institute of Design for
Innovation, School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of
Technology, China. His research interests include design theory and
methodology, new product development, etc.
YANG Bojun is currently a PhD candidate in Institute of Design for
Innovation, School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of
Technology, China. His research interests include design theory and
methodology, software engineering.
SUN Jianguang is currently a PhD candidate in Institute of Design for
Innovation, School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of
Technology, China. His research interests include design theory and
methodology, design of power systems.
References
[1] QARY L. Dealing with a project’s fuzzy front end[J]. Harvard
Management Update, 2003, 8(6): 3-4.
[2] REINERTSEN D G. Taking the fuzziness out of the fuzzy front end[J].
Research Technology Management, 1999, 42(6): 25-31.
[3] DOOLEY K J. Adoption rates and patterns of best practices in new
product development[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,
2002, 6(1): 85-103.
[4] FLINT D J. Compressing new product success-to-success cycle time
deep customer value understanding and idea generation[J]. Industrial
Marketing Management, 2002, 31(4): 305-315.
[5] RICE M P, KELLEY D, PETERS L. Radical innovation: triggering
initiation of opportunity recognition and evaluation[J]. R&D Manage-
ment, 2001, 31(4): 409-420.
[6] PRATHER C W. Keeping innovation alive after the consultants leave[J].
Research Technology Management, 2000, 43(5): 17-22.
[7] RICHARD L, CHRISTOPHER M, GIAN C. Radical. innovation[M]. Boston:
Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
[8] MARTIN R. Technology roadmaps: Infrastructure for innovation[J].
Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2004, 71: 67-80.
[9] YE Z G, ZOU H J, GUO W Z. Automatic design theory and realization of
kinematic schemes for mechanism system[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong
University, 2004, 38(6): 882-887. (in Chinese)
[10] ZHANG S, FENG P E, PAN S X. Study on automatic conceptual design
strategy based on cyclic mapping mode[J]. Journal of Computer Aided
Design & Computer Graphics, 2005,17(3): 491-497. (in Chinese)
[11] PAHL G, BEITZ W. Engineering design[M]. 2nd Edition, London:
Springer Press, 1996.
[12] HERSTATT C, GESCHKA H. Need Assessment in practice — theory,
methods and experiences[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurship
and Innovation Management, 2002, 2(1): 56-68.
[13] DENIS C, NIKOLAI K. From TRIZ to OTSM-TRIZ: addressing complexity
challenges in inventive design[J]. International Journal of Product
Development, 2007, 4(1/2): 4-21.
[14] SHAH J J, SANTOSH V K, HERNANDEZ N. Guidelines for experimental
evaluation of idea generation methods[C]//Proceedings of ASME Design
Theory and Methodology Conference, Baltimore, USA, 2000, 122(4):
377-384.
[15] BENAMI O, JIN Y. Creative stimulation in conceptual design[C]//
ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC2002/ DTM-34023),
Montreal, Canada, 2002, 20: 1-13.
[16] GOLDENBERG J. Finding your innovation sweet spot[J]. Harvard
Business Review, 2003, 81(3): 120-129.
[17] ALTSHULLER G. The Innovation Algorithm, TRIZ, Systematic Innovation
and Technical Creativity[M]. Worcester: Technical Innovation Center,
1999.
[18] SILERSTEIN D, DECARLO N, SLOCUM M. Insourcing Innovation[M].
Longmont: Breakthrough Performance Press, 2005.
[19] MARTIN G. M. How combinations of TRIZ tools are used in companies —
results of a cluster analysis[J]. R&D Management, 2005, 35(3): 285-296.
[20] TAN R H. Process of two stages analogy-based design employing
TRIZ[J]. International Journal of Product Development, 2007, 4(1/2):
109-121.
[21] KOHN S, HUSING S, KOLYLA A. Development of an empirical based
categorsation scheme for CAI software[C]//1st IFIP TC-5 Working
Conference on CAI, ULM, Germany, 2005: 143-157.
[22] TAN R H, MA J H, CAO G Z. InventionTool3.0[P]. Software Patent
Number: 2006SR13729.
[23] SCHRAW G, DUNKLE M E, BENDIXEN L D. Cognitive process in
well-defined and ill-defined problem solving[J]. Applied Cognitive
Psychology, 1995, 9: 523-538.
[24] AVRANSKY S D. Engineering of creativity[M]. Florida: CRC Press,
2002.
[25] CLAUSING D, FRY V. Effective innovation[M]. New York: ASME Press,
2004.
[26] MICHAEL S S. Technology maturity using S-curve descriptors[J/OL].
TRIZ Journal, 1999, 4, http://www.triz-journal.com.
[27] MUELLER G. Accurately and rapidly predicting next-generation
product breakthroughs in the medical-devices, disposable shaving
systems, and cosmetics industries[J/OL]. TRIZ Journal, 1999, 3, http://www.triz-journal.com.
[28] ZHANG H G, TAN R H. The technology maturity of product and its
mapping[C]//2004 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and
RD&D Expo (IMECE2004-59260), Anaheim, California, USA, 2004.
[29] CAO G Z, TAN R H. FBES model for conceptual design[J].
International Journal of Product Development, 2007, 4(1/2): 22-36.
[30] CAO G Z, TAN R H, ZHANG R H. Connect effects and control effects in
conceptual design[J]. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science,
2004, 8: 75-82.
[31] OTTO K, WOOD K. Product design: techniques in reverse engineering
and new product development[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2001.
|